《高尔夫球规则》是由苏格兰圣安德鲁斯皇家古老高尔夫球俱乐部及美国高尔夫球协会审定，世界通用的最权威职业和业余选手之行为规范用书。当比赛进行时，每位选手皆负有使比赛公平公正之责任。

　　熟知高尔夫球规则，你将拥有更多的高尔夫乐趣、健康、友谊和尊重。“每日规则解答”将使您更为深入的了解高尔夫球规则。

　　3-3/6 Competitor Plays Original Ball After Doubtful Situation Has Arisen and Then Invokes Rule 3-3

　　Q:In stroke play, a competitors ball lies in a water hazard. A movable stake defining the margin of the hazard interferes with the area of his intended swing. He makes his next stroke, avoiding the stake. It then occurs to him that he may have been entitled to remove the stake. The competitor informs his marker that he is invoking Rule 3-3 and elects to score with a second ball. He removes the stake and drops a second ball at the spot from which his original ball was played. He holes out with both balls. What is the ruling?

　　A:The situation that caused the doubt arose when the competitors ball lay in the water hazard and the stake interfered with his swing. Since the competitor took further action, i.e., played the original ball, after the situation that caused the doubt had arisen, the score with the original ball must count -- see the Note to Rule 3-3a.

　　However, the competitor incurs no penalty for having played the second ball. (Revised)

　　3-3/6 在未确定的位置已经出现后，比赛者打了原始球，随后调后规则3－3

　　问：在比杆赛上，一名比赛者的球停在水障碍。一个可移动的立桩定义障碍区的边缘，它影响比赛者意欲挥杆的区域。他打了下一杆，避开了立桩。随后发现他有权移动立桩。比赛者通知记分员，他要调用规则3－3，并选择计算第2个球的成绩。他移动了立桩，并从所打的原始球的地点抛了第2个球。他把两个球都打进了洞。这时应该怎么裁定？

　　答：当比赛者的球位于水障碍时，球的位置就引起了质疑，立桩影响他的挥杆。因为比赛者采取了进一步的动作，也就是打了原始球，当位置引发质疑的时候，必须计算原始球的成绩——见规则3－3a的注释。

　　不过，比赛者不会因为打了第2个球而受罚。（修正）
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　（golftime·Sara编译）